Did you know guardian ad litem's don't have to be qualified?
Yes! And the tyrants here in the Commonwealth allow it! See § 16.1-266.1 law code.
Not that becoming "qualified" is a vigorous process, just a seven hour course, but a mere inconvenience for these money hungry parasites driven by the tyrant judges that allow their barratrous conduct in the courtroom. So what this law says is that any attorney with a law degree and some experience in juvenile cases can at the discretion of the judge be appointed as a guardian. Do you really want any slime ball with a law degree interviewing your child? I personally don't, qualified or not.
With approximately 150 "qualified" guardians in district 15 am I really to believe none were available? If that is the case then I would say we have a tremendous problem here in district 15. I never asked the court to appoint a guardian ad litem, they did so on their own. I wander how many cases out there have guardians appointed that don't need or request one. Is the J&DR court here that flooded with cases? If so, I will say it again, Get out of our lives and the lives of our children and let us parents raise them as we see fit. Stop allowing judicial abuse of good parents. Stop allowing the barratrous filings of these money hungry parasites.
Sherry,
ReplyDeleteI totally agree that we have a serious problem here and we "together" will continue fighting this corruption to bring about justice for our children.
I will say that the least qualified GALs in Virginia are Jannell Wolfe, Mary Ellen Slugg and Sharon Fast Gustafson, because they are all pro-CPS and anti-family.
ReplyDeletePeacefully Yours, Nancy A. Hey
When will Virginia finally start calling these people "Best Interests Lawyers?" That's what the ABA does. The ABA doesn't even recognize the term "guardian ad litem." Why does Virginia even bother "qualifying" guardians ad litem when the premiere association for lawyers in America says guardians ad litem don't exist! No way would I want any slime ball pettifogging shyster-guardian interviewing my child--qualified or not.
ReplyDeleteJust Wondering why Deborah S. Olin is still on this list? She got a Government job starting Jan. of 2009, after damaging so many children's lives in Fairfax & Arlington..........She was one of the most Dangerous & Despicable GALs with no children of her own who hates seeing happy children. Don't get me wrong, she still Influencing her felow Judges to demolish more Innocent lives. She is Noticeably & mentally sick..... Qualified to deal with our Children's issues???????? She is so Scary & stone hearted to do the job.
ReplyDeleteWhere does this fat psycho bitch work now? I'm talking about Deborah Olin who uses illegal tactics like lying in open court and talking to the Judge Wiggins privately before court even starts so she can influence the judge's decision. She needs to be disciplined and I know some people ready to do it now.
DeleteI do believe that we need strict laws governing over Guardian ad Litems. We need someone to look over the reccomendations of the Guardian. If they are continued to be afforded quasi immunity in negligent cases, how can they be held accountable. I do not believe that a Judge should take so highly the reccomendations of the Guardian, when the custodial parent is so opposed to her decision. The safety and welfare of the child should always be paramount in court. And I have had personal experience where it hasn't been!! We need new specific laws governing over the Guardian ad Litems in Child Custody Cases!!! Our Justice system is failing to protect many Children!!
ReplyDelete